R. v. Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Wagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud |
Citation | 2022 SCC 5 |
Docket Number | 39701 |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Date | 15 March 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...OR (3d) 775, 116 CCC (3d) 183 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1997] SCCA No 398 ................................ 134 R v Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5 ................................................................................... 385 R v Brydges, [1990] 1 SCR 190, 74 CR (3d) 129, 53 CCC ......
-
Self-Defence, Necessity, and Duress
...that the subjective purpose of self-defence is not 56 R v Hebert (1996), 107 CCC (3d) 42 at 50 (SCC) [ Hebert ]. 57 R v Brunelle , 2022 SCC 5. 58 R v Knott , 2014 MBQB 72 at para 104 [ Knott ]. In this case, the judge also found that the accused’s actions were reasonable because “a tolerant......
-
R v Metzger,
...light of human experience, allowed the judge to infer guilt on the underlying robbery. Cases Cited By Rowe J. Referred to: R. v. Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5; R. v. Burke, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 474 ; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 , [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000 ; R. v. Phillips, 2018 ONCA 651 , 364 C.C.C. (3......
-
R v Bear,
...that cut to the core of K.K.’s testimony. [25] In R v Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5 [Brunelle], the Supreme Court of Canada recently had occasion to discuss the nature of appellate review where, as here, it is argued that a verdict r......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
R v Metzger,
...light of human experience, allowed the judge to infer guilt on the underlying robbery. Cases Cited By Rowe J. Referred to: R. v. Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5; R. v. Burke, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 474 ; R. v. Villaroman, 2016 SCC 33 , [2016] 1 S.C.R. 1000 ; R. v. Phillips, 2018 ONCA 651 , 364 C.C.C. (3......
-
R v Bear,
...that cut to the core of K.K.’s testimony. [25] In R v Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5 [Brunelle], the Supreme Court of Canada recently had occasion to discuss the nature of appellate review where, as here, it is argued that a verdict r......
-
R v D.B.,
...the verdict cannot be supported by the evidence; and (2) where the verdict is vitiated by illogical or irrational reasoning (R v Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5; R v Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5, [2007] 1 SCR 190; R v Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, [2011] 3 SCR 3). In terms of credibility assessments, while the u......
-
R. v. P.H.,
...[1996] 1 SCR 254; R. v. Gagnon, 2006 SCC 17, [2006] 1 SCR 621; Benhaim v. St Germain, 2016 SCC 48, [2016] 2 SCR 352; R. v. Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5; F.H. v. McDougall, 2008 SCC 53, [2008] 3 SCR 41; R. v. Darwish, 2010 ONCA 124; R. v. Spackman, 2012 ONCA 905; Ontario (Labour) v. Miller Group Inc......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...OR (3d) 775, 116 CCC (3d) 183 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [1997] SCCA No 398 ................................ 134 R v Brunelle, 2022 SCC 5 ................................................................................... 385 R v Brydges, [1990] 1 SCR 190, 74 CR (3d) 129, 53 CCC ......
-
Self-Defence, Necessity, and Duress
...that the subjective purpose of self-defence is not 56 R v Hebert (1996), 107 CCC (3d) 42 at 50 (SCC) [ Hebert ]. 57 R v Brunelle , 2022 SCC 5. 58 R v Knott , 2014 MBQB 72 at para 104 [ Knott ]. In this case, the judge also found that the accused’s actions were reasonable because “a tolerant......